Why Harris-Walz is still the better pick for US-China engagement
- Walz, though a critic of Beijing, has a genuine affection for China and its people. He’s likely to bring realpolitik to US foreign policy
It reminds me of the hilarious ways in which Republicans successfully demonised legendary Florida congressman Claude Pepper in 1950, including by calling him “Red Pepper” for his liberal views, during the anti-communist “red scare”.
Let’s try to set the record straight for Walz.
It is true that young Walz was a high school teacher of American culture and history as well as English in southern China on a programme founded by Harvard students in the momentous 1989-1990 period, and was among the earliest cohort of American teachers in China.
As a football coach at Mankato West High School in Minnesota, Walz took his team from a bunch of losers to state champions in 1999. In China, Walz’s young students at Foshan No 1 High School nicknamed him “Fields of China” for his kindness.
While friendly with the Chinese people, Walz is no fan of China’s Communist Party and has criticised the government. From 2007 to 2018, he served on the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, which monitors its legal and human rights developments, and was described as a “stalwart” member by the chairman. He was a frequent critic of China’s human rights record – his photo with the Dalai Lama is well-known.
If Harris-Walz can win the November 5 election – widely seen as a virtual toss-up – it will be a net win for US-China relations, as Walz has a genuine affection for China and its people. Michael Hayden, a former director of the CIA and National Security Agency, has said of Walz’s knowledge of China: “So he knows a lot about it. That’s great.” If Harris wins, Walz would be in a prime position to influence policy in an administration whose leader lacks foreign policy experience, especially with China.
Knowledge is power and so is personal experience. Walz looks set to be the perfect realpolitik practitioner, capable of building bridges and being frank in private negotiations while publicly displaying a pragmatism – because he “gets” China from having lived there and being familiar with the Chinese culture, language and people.
More than seven decades ago, China’s first premier, Zhou Enlai, was prescient in proposing a model of diplomacy that he called “folk diplomacy”. Today, such a concept is more commonly known as people-to-people connectivity, a key element of a nation’s soft power, its influence in shaping the preferences of others using a toolkit that includes culture, foreign policy and tourism – as distinct from hard power, which involves the use of force and coercion.
While it may be too much to see an instant reset in US-China relations, even from a Harris-Walz administration, we can at least hope for an initial modus vivendi where both countries can find a coexistence capable of addressing our shared existential challenges.
Only by building a global community with a shared future and working together, whether bilaterally or in international, regional and multilateral groupings, might we avoid a certain extinction.
Unlike the Trump-Vance Republican team, which I see as false prophets of gloom and doom, I believe a Harris-Walz administration has the potential to slow the downward spiral of US-China relations and engage where we can and must, starting at noon on January 20, 2025.
Dr Harvey Dzodin is a senior fellow of the Centre for China and Globalisation, a former political appointee in the Carter administration and vice-president of ABC-TV